IWY vs MAGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWY and MAGS hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned +12.2% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $15.8bn for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF and $5.7bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
IWY costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.5 points; IWY is 2.8 times larger.
| IWY | MAGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.30% |
| Net assets | $15.8bn | $5.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.7% | +12.2% |
| What it tracks | Russell Top 200 Growth Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 20% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 60.9% | 29.3% |
| Below its high | 5.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWY and MAGS hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
20% in common
On the same fields
IWY and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IWY
IWY tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
About MAGS
MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWY or MAGS?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWY returned +4.7% and MAGS +12.2%.
- Which is cheaper, IWY or MAGS?
- IWY is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWY against MAGS, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwy-vs-mags
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). IWY against MAGS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwy-vs-mags
[IWY against MAGS (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwy-vs-mags)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.