JGRO vs QQQM: Differences, Returns & Fees
JGRO and QQQM hold 45% of their weight in the same names, and QQQM returned +18.0% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $9.8bn for JPMorgan Active Growth ETF and $108.5bn for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF.
QQQM costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.9 points; QQQM is 11.1 times larger.
| JGRO | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.44% | 0.15% |
| Net assets | $9.8bn | $108.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +0.1% | +18.0% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Nasdaq-100 Index |
| Holdings in common | 45% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 51.1% | 47.2% |
| Below its high | 5.6%, high on Jun 2, 2026 | 5.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 19, 2026 and Oct 20, 2026.
JGRO and QQQM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. JGRO follows No index, actively managed and QQQM follows Nasdaq-100 Index.
- Holdings in common. 45% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 20, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 JGRO returned +0.1% and QQQM +18.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 17.9 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JGRO and QQQM hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 19, 2026 and Oct 20, 2026.
half
45% in common
On the same fields
JGRO and QQQM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About JGRO
JGRO is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 20, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 135 positions, with the top ten at 51.1%. It sat 5.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
About QQQM
QQQM tracks the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.9% for its benchmark, the Nasdaq-100 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 47.2%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, JGRO or QQQM?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JGRO returned +0.1% and QQQM +18.0%.
- Which is cheaper, JGRO or QQQM?
- QQQM is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JGRO against QQQM, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jgro-vs-qqqm
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). JGRO against QQQM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jgro-vs-qqqm
[JGRO against QQQM (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/jgro-vs-qqqm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.