IWV vs TMFC: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWV and TMFC hold 49% of their weight in the same names, and IWV returned +16.7% over the year. Net assets: $20.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 3000 ETF, and $2.1bn on May 31, 2026 for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF.

IWV costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.6 points; IWV is 12.1 times larger.

IWV vs TMFC: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWVTMFC
Expense ratio0.20%0.50%
Net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025$15.5bn$1.3bn
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+15.1%
What it tracksRussell 3000 IndexMotley Fool 100 Index
Holdings in common49%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.7%55.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
+15.1%
TMFC total return, 1 year
0.20%
IWV expense ratio
0.50%
TMFC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWV and TMFC hold 49% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

49% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWV TMFC
NVIDIA 7.15% 9.40%
APPLE 6.51% 8.29%
MICROSOFT 5.32% 6.24%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.40% 5.30%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.74% 8.66%
BROADCOM INC 2.25% 4.92%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.11% 3.79%
TESLA INC 1.49% 2.31%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.32% 3.20%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.28% 1.93%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.19% 3.03%
VISA CLASS A 0.87% 2.37%
Only in IWV
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.21%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.55%
ELI LILLY 1.26%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.93%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.84%
ABBVIE 0.65%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.63%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.62%
Only in TMFC
ALTABA INC ORD SHS ESCROW 0.00%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.7% +15.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VTHR) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTHR not available
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.50%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 98.0%
Holdings 2600 101
Net assets, IWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and TMFC as of May 31, 2026 $20.6bn $2.1bn

IWV and TMFC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

About TMFC

TMFC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 55.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWV or TMFC?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWV returned +16.7% and TMFC +15.1%.
Which is cheaper, IWV or TMFC?
IWV is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWV and TMFC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of IWV and 98% of TMFC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWV against TMFC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwv-vs-tmfc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.