FLQL vs IWV: Differences, Returns & Fees

FLQL and IWV hold 51% of their weight in the same names, and FLQL returned +18.4% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $2.2bn for Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF and $20.6bn for iShares Russell 3000 ETF.

FLQL costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.7 points; IWV is 9.3 times larger.

FLQL vs IWV: Differences, Returns & Fees
FLQLIWV
Expense ratio0.15%0.20%
Net assets$2.2bn$20.6bn
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+16.7%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQRussell 3000 Index
Holdings in common51%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund36.0%34.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+18.4%
FLQL total return, 1 year
+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
0.15%
FLQL expense ratio
0.20%
IWV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FLQL and IWV hold 51% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

51% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FLQL IWV
NVIDIA CORP 6.72% 7.15%
APPLE INC 6.88% 6.51%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.82% 5.32%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.07% 3.40%
ALPHABET INC 3.77% 2.74%
BROADCOM INC 2.47% 2.25%
ALPHABET INC 3.02% 2.21%
META PLATFORMS INC 1.81% 2.11%
TESLA INC 1.35% 1.49%
ELI LILLY & COMPANY 1.38% 1.26%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 1.11% 1.19%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 0.97% 1.28%
Only in FLQL
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC 0.28%
WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORP 0.10%
Only in IWV
VISA CLASS A 0.87%
WALMART 0.65%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.64%
MASTERCARD CLASS A 0.64%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.62%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.56%
CHEVRON 0.53%
BANK OF AMERICA 0.47%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FLQL
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF
IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +18.4% +16.7%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +16.8% (VTHR)
Gap to its benchmark not available −0.1 pts vs VTHR
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 89.5% 87.8%
Holdings 215 2600
Net assets $2.2bn $20.6bn

FLQL and IWV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FLQL

FLQL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 215 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLQL or IWV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLQL returned +18.4% and IWV +16.7%.
Which is cheaper, FLQL or IWV?
FLQL is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FLQL and IWV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of FLQL and 88% of IWV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLQL against IWV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flql-vs-iwv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.