IWV vs SFLR: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWV and SFLR hold 62% of their weight in the same names, and IWV returned +16.7% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $20.6bn for iShares Russell 3000 ETF and $2.3bn for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF.

IWV costs 0.69 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.8 points; IWV is 9.0 times larger.

IWV vs SFLR: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWVSFLR
Expense ratio0.20%0.89%
Net assets$20.6bn$2.3bn
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+9.9%
What it tracksRussell 3000 IndexNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common62%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.7%37.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
+9.9%
SFLR total return, 1 year
0.20%
IWV expense ratio
0.89%
SFLR expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWV and SFLR hold 62% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

62% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWV SFLR
NVIDIA 7.15% 7.35%
APPLE 6.51% 7.04%
MICROSOFT 5.32% 4.96%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.40% 4.19%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.74% 3.27%
BROADCOM INC 2.25% 2.96%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.21% 2.83%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.11% 1.78%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.55% 1.74%
TESLA INC 1.49% 1.39%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.32% 1.48%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.28% 1.32%
Only in IWV
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 0.45%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL 0.42%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP 0.35%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT INC 0.35%
RTX 0.34%
WELLS FARGO 0.34%
ARISTA NETWORKS 0.30%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 0.29%
Only in SFLR
TE Connectivity PLC 0.32%
Venture Global Inc 0.12%
MercadoLibre Inc 0.11%
Amrize Ltd 0.05%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +16.7% +9.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VTHR) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTHR not available
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.89%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 90.9%
Holdings 2600 188
Net assets $20.6bn $2.3bn

IWV and SFLR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

About SFLR

SFLR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.89% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 188 positions, with the top ten at 37.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWV or SFLR?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWV returned +16.7% and SFLR +9.9%.
Which is cheaper, IWV or SFLR?
IWV is cheaper, by 0.69 percentage points a year. That is about $69 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWV and SFLR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of IWV and 91% of SFLR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWV against SFLR, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwv-vs-sflr

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.