IWB vs QVML: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWB and QVML hold 80% of their weight in the same names, and QVML returned +17.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $49.6bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF and $1.7bn for Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF.

QVML costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.2 points; IWB is far larger, $49.6bn against $1.7bn.

IWB vs QVML: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWBQVML
Expense ratio0.15%0.11%
Net assets$49.6bn$1.7bn
Total return, 1 year+16.6%+17.8%
What it tracksRussell 1000 IndexS&P 500 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-Factor Index
Holdings in common80%
Holdings datedOct 9, 2026Oct 10, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund36.1%42.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+16.6%
IWB total return, 1 year
+17.8%
QVML total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.11%
QVML expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and QVML hold 80% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

80% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWB QVML
NVIDIA 7.44% 8.97%
APPLE 6.77% 8.12%
MICROSOFT 5.53% 6.74%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.54% 4.43%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.85% 4.57%
BROADCOM INC 2.34% 2.87%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.61% 1.79%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.38% 1.48%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.34% 1.59%
ELI LILLY 1.31% 1.59%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.24% 1.48%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.97% 1.14%
Only in IWB
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.30%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.20%
TESLA INC 1.56%
ABBVIE 0.68%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.65%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL 0.44%
ORACLE 0.34%
GILEAD SCIENCES 0.26%
Only in QVML
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.28%
TE Connectivity PLC 0.10%
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 0.10%
NXP Semiconductors NV 0.10%
Skydance Corp 0.02%
SECURITIES LENDING - BNYM 0.00%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.6% +17.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VONE) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE not available
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.11%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 99.6%
Holdings 1025 438
Net assets $49.6bn $1.7bn

IWB and QVML on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

About QVML

QVML tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.11% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 438 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or QVML?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and QVML +17.8%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or QVML?
QVML is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and QVML overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 100% of QVML by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against QVML, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-qvml

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.