IWB vs KLMN: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWB and KLMN hold 81% of their weight in the same names, and KLMN returned +17.2% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $49.6bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF and $2.5bn for Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF.
KLMN costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points; IWB is 19.9 times larger.
| IWB | KLMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| Net assets | $49.6bn | $2.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.6% | +17.2% |
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Index | MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index |
| Holdings in common | 81% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 9, 2026 | Oct 10, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 36.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and KLMN hold 81% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
81% in common
On the same fields
IWB and KLMN on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
About KLMN
KLMN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 274 positions, with the top ten at 36.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or KLMN?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and KLMN +17.2%.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or KLMN?
- KLMN is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWB against KLMN, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-klmn
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IWB against KLMN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-klmn
[IWB against KLMN (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-klmn)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.