KLMN vs SCHB: Differences, Returns & Fees
KLMN and SCHB hold 76% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $2.5bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF, and $43.3bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF.
SCHB costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; SCHB is 19.2 times larger.
| KLMN | SCHB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of May 31, 2026 | $2.3bn | $43.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +16.8% |
| What it tracks | MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index | Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index |
| Holdings in common | 76% | |
| Holdings dated | Oct 10, 2026 | May 31, 2026 |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.5% | 34.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KLMN and SCHB hold 76% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
76% in common
On the same fields
KLMN and SCHB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About KLMN
KLMN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 274 positions, with the top ten at 36.5%.
About SCHB
SCHB tracks an index of US broad market. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,405 positions, with the top ten at 34.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, KLMN or SCHB?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, KLMN returned +17.2% and SCHB +16.8%.
- Which is cheaper, KLMN or SCHB?
- SCHB is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, KLMN against SCHB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/klmn-vs-schb
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). KLMN against SCHB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/klmn-vs-schb
[KLMN against SCHB (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/klmn-vs-schb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.