QLTY vs SCHB: Differences, Returns & Fees

QLTY and SCHB hold 31% of their weight in the same names, and QLTY returned +19.9% over the year. Net assets on May 31, 2026: $4.5bn for GMO U.S. Quality ETF and $43.3bn for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF.

SCHB costs 0.47 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points; SCHB is 9.6 times larger.

QLTY vs SCHB: Differences, Returns & Fees
QLTYSCHB
Expense ratio0.50%0.03%
Net assets, as of May 31, 2026$4.5bn$43.3bn
Total return, 1 year+19.9%+16.8%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedDow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index
Holdings in common31%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund48.9%34.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.

+19.9%
QLTY total return, 1 year
+16.8%
SCHB total return, 1 year
0.50%
QLTY expense ratio
0.03%
SCHB expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QLTY and SCHB hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

half

31% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding QLTY SCHB
Apple Inc 5.12% 6.26%
Microsoft Corp 7.17% 4.57%
Amazon.com Inc 3.90% 3.62%
Alphabet Inc 5.64% 3.03%
Broadcom Inc 4.79% 2.90%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.32% 1.89%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.52% 1.20%
Visa Inc 2.58% 0.75%
Johnson & Johnson 4.22% 0.74%
Mastercard Inc 1.78% 0.55%
Lam Research Corp 5.38% 0.54%
Netflix Inc 1.69% 0.50%
Only in QLTY
Only in SCHB
NVIDIA Corp 7.02%
Alphabet Inc 2.41%
Tesla Inc 1.68%
Micron Technology Inc 1.49%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.19%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.15%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.10%
Exxon Mobil Corp 0.83%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

QLTY
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer GMO Schwab
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of US broad market
Total return, 1 year +19.9% +16.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +17.3% (VOO) not published
Gap to its benchmark +2.6 pts vs VOO not available
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 96.5% 88.8%
Holdings 41 2405
Net assets, as of May 31, 2026 $4.5bn $43.3bn

QLTY and SCHB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About QLTY

QLTY is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 41 positions, with the top ten at 48.9%.

About SCHB

SCHB tracks an index of US broad market. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,405 positions, with the top ten at 34.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QLTY or SCHB?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QLTY returned +19.9% and SCHB +16.8%.
Which is cheaper, QLTY or SCHB?
SCHB is cheaper, by 0.47 percentage points a year. That is about $47 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QLTY and SCHB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of QLTY and 89% of SCHB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QLTY against SCHB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qlty-vs-schb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.