CGDV vs QUS: Differences, Returns & Fees

CGDV and QUS hold 30% of their weight in the same names, and CGDV returned +18.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 8, 2026: $38.9bn for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and $1.6bn for State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF.

QUS costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.3 points; CGDV is far larger, $38.9bn against $1.6bn.

CGDV vs QUS: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGDVQUS
Expense ratio0.33%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$38.9bn$1.6bn
Total return, 1 year+18.5%+15.2%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index ?
Holdings in common30%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.7%23.0%
Below its high3.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+18.5%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+15.2%
QUS total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.15%
QUS expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and QUS hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

30% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CGDV QUS
Microsoft Corp 5.81% 3.77%
NVIDIA Corp 5.66% 2.87%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.33% 2.62%
Apple Inc 2.36% 3.26%
Eli Lilly & Co 3.15% 2.21%
Cisco Systems Inc 3.02% 1.39%
Alphabet Inc 3.59% 1.32%
Mastercard Inc 1.30% 1.58%
Applied Materials Inc 3.12% 1.15%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.89% 1.02%
Amazon.com Inc 1.88% 0.99%
Texas Instruments Inc 1.21% 0.75%
Only in CGDV
British American Tobacco PLC 2.66%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 2.16%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.02%
Exxon Mobil Corp 1.34%
TC Energy Corp 1.33%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 0.82%
Only in QUS
VISA INC CLASS A SHARES 1.98%
JOHNSON + JOHNSON 1.86%
MERCK + CO. INC. 1.41%
WALMART INC 1.27%
PROCTER + GAMBLE CO/THE 1.18%
ALPHABET INC CL C 1.17%
COCA COLA CO/THE 1.15%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.14%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
QUS
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +18.5% +15.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +26.4% (IWD) not published
Gap to its benchmark −7.9 pts vs IWD not available
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 91.0% 96.6%
Holdings 53 514
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $38.9bn $1.6bn

CGDV and QUS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About CGDV

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 38.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.5% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

About QUS

QUS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 514 positions, with the top ten at 23.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or QUS?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +18.5% and QUS +15.2%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or QUS?
QUS is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and QUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of CGDV and 97% of QUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against QUS, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-qus

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.