Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGDV vs PVAL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to PVAL's +26.6%; 25% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGDV and PVAL

Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $14.1bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF.

At a glance
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+26.6%
PVAL total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.55%
PVAL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

CGDV costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points.

CGDV vs PVAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVPVAL
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%+26.6%
Drawdown
Below its high3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.55%
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026$39.1bn$14.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common25%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%42.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns · each against IWD
CGDV PVAL
Return
Total return edge PVAL (slight) +107.2% +110.6%
Annualized edge PVAL (slight) +16.9% +17.4%
Price return edge PVAL (slight) +93.0% +99.9%
Risk
Volatility edge CGDV (slight) 14.8% 15.2%
Max drawdown edge PVAL −21.1% −15.6%
Downside capture 88.1% 92.7%
Beta 0.93 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.85 0.85
Sortino edge Tie 1.28 1.26
Treynor 0.134 0.130
Calmar edge PVAL 0.80 1.12
Against the benchmark
Alpha +4.4% a year +4.2% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.70 2.27
Information ratio 0.68 1.06
Tracking error 5.6% 4.0%
Reading

PVAL returned slightly more: +110.6% to +107.2%. CGDV swung slightly less: 14.8% to 15.2%. PVAL fell less at its worst: −15.6% to −21.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGDV vs PVAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVPVALIWDEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+107.2%+110.6%PVAL (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.9%+17.4%PVAL (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+93.0%+99.9%PVAL (slight)Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.8%15.2%CGDV (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation9.8%10.3%CGDV (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−21.1%−15.6%PVALDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture93.8%101.7%100.0%PVAL (slight)Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture88.1%92.7%100.0%CGDV (slight)Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.931.001.00CGDV lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.860.931.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.850.85TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.281.26TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1340.1300.087CGDV (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.801.12PVALAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWDIWDIWDThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+4.4% a year+4.2% a year0.0%PVAL significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.702.27Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +9.4%+0.6% to +7.9%CGDV's includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.681.06PVALReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.6%4.0%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

25%

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and PVAL hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

25% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGDV PVAL
Microsoft Corp 7.64% 9.27%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.60% 2.88%
Apple Inc 2.21% 6.70%
Amazon.com Inc 2.00% 4.71%
AbbVie Inc 1.54% 1.94%
Philip Morris International Inc 1.44% 2.64%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 1.31% 3.77%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.13% 1.60%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 3.49% 1.02%
Prologis Inc 0.98% 1.83%
NextEra Energy Inc 0.93% 1.74%
Apollo Global Management Inc 0.82% 1.38%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGDV
NVIDIA Corp 6.32%
Broadcom Inc 4.67%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.27%
Alphabet Inc 3.55%
Oracle Corp 3.22%
RTX Corp 3.16%
General Electric Co 3.05%
Comcast Corp 2.61%
Only in PVAL
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (THE) 3.25%
CITIGROUP INC 3.25%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC 3.13%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 2.95%
ALLSTATE CORP (THE) 2.86%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 2.70%
VALERO ENERGY CORP 2.54%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC 2.48%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +15.8% +26.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) +27.5% (IWD)
Gap to its benchmark −11.7 pts vs IWD −0.9 pts vs IWD
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.55%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 91.4%
Holdings 53 44
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and PVAL as of Aug 31, 2026 $39.1bn $14.1bn

CGDV and PVAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-A1C923D64D

CGDV and PVAL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Holdings in common. 25% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
  2. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and PVAL +26.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.8 points.
  3. Cost. CGDV charges 0.33% of assets a year and PVAL 0.55%, a gap of 0.22 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGDV

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

PVAL

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

PVAL is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or PVAL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and PVAL +26.6%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or PVAL?
CGDV is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and PVAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of CGDV and 91% of PVAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against PVAL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-pval

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.