Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGDV vs PRF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to PRF's +24.1%; 28% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGDV and PRF
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $39.1bn for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and $10.1bn for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGDV costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.3 points; CGDV is 3.9 times larger.
| Measure | CGDV | PRF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.8% | +24.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.34% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $39.1bn | $10.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 28% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.0% | 23.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and PRF hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
28% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGDV and PRF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGDV and PRF are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CGDV follows No index, actively managed and PRF follows RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index.
- Holdings in common. 28% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and PRF +24.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.3 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGDV
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
PRF tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.34% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 998 positions, with the top ten at 23.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or PRF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and PRF +24.1%.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or PRF?
- CGDV is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGDV against PRF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-prf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGDV against PRF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-prf
[CGDV against PRF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-prf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.