IVE vs PRF: Differences, Returns & Fees

IVE and PRF hold 64% of their weight in the same names, and PRF returned +24.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $49.3bn for iShares S&P 500 Value ETF and $10.0bn for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF.

IVE costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.4 points; IVE is 4.9 times larger.

IVE vs PRF: Differences, Returns & Fees
IVEPRF
Expense ratio0.18%0.34%
Net assets$49.3bn$10.0bn
Total return, 1 year+14.4%+24.8%
What it tracksS&P 500 Value IndexRAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index
Holdings in common64%
Holdings datedOct 9, 2026Oct 10, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund24.7%23.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+14.4%
IVE total return, 1 year
+24.8%
PRF total return, 1 year
0.18%
IVE expense ratio
0.34%
PRF expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVE and PRF hold 64% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

64% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IVE PRF
APPLE 8.28% 4.66%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.08% 2.39%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.34% 1.94%
CHEVRON 1.41% 1.36%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.75% 1.22%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP 1.15% 1.15%
BANK OF AMERICA 1.19% 1.07%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 0.95% 1.62%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.87% 1.08%
MERCK & CO INC 1.21% 0.81%
WELLS FARGO 0.85% 0.81%
WALMART 1.67% 0.78%
Only in IVE
NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.19%
GARMIN 0.15%
CARVANA CLASS A 0.08%
TEXAS PACIFIC LAND 0.07%
AXON ENTERPRISE 0.04%
BIO TECHNE 0.04%
LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT 0.04%
LULULEMON ATHLETICA 0.03%
Only in PRF
Alphabet Inc 3.41%
Microsoft Corp 3.25%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.05%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.81%
NVIDIA Corp 0.79%
Micron Technology Inc 0.62%
Broadcom Inc 0.55%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 0.47%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IVE
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
PRF
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +14.4% +24.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.5% (SPYV) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs SPYV not available
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.34%
Already in the S&P 500 99.8% 86.6%
Holdings 437 1000
Net assets $49.3bn $10.0bn

IVE and PRF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IVE

IVE tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +14.5% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 437 positions, with the top ten at 24.7%.

About PRF

PRF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.34% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,000 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVE or PRF?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVE returned +14.4% and PRF +24.8%.
Which is cheaper, IVE or PRF?
IVE is cheaper, by 0.16 percentage points a year. That is about $16 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVE and PRF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of IVE and 87% of PRF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IVE against PRF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ive-vs-prf

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.