Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGDV vs FNDX: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to FNDX's +23.9%; 26% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGDV and FNDX

Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF.

At a glance
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FNDX costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.1 points.

CGDV vs FNDX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVFNDX
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%+23.9%
Drawdown
Below its high3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFundamental U.S. Large Company
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.25%
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026$39.1bn$27.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common26%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%21.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGDV FNDX
Return
Total return edge CGDV +107.2% +87.2%
Annualized edge CGDV +16.9% +14.4%
Price return edge CGDV +93.0% +71.5%
Risk
Volatility edge Tie 14.8% 14.7%
Max drawdown edge FNDX −21.1% −18.3%
Downside capture 88.1% 92.1%
Beta 0.93 0.93
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CGDV 0.85 0.71
Sortino edge CGDV 1.28 1.03
Treynor 0.134 0.128
Calmar edge Tie 0.80 0.79
Against the benchmark
Alpha +4.4% a year +0.4% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.70 0.28
Information ratio 0.68 −0.10
Tracking error 5.6% 5.3%

Each against its own benchmark: CGDV against IWD, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; FNDX against IWB, Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

CGDV returned more: +107.2% to +87.2%. CGDV and FNDX swung about the same: 14.8% and 14.7%. FNDX fell less at its worst: −18.3% to −21.1%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGDV vs FNDX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVFNDXEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+107.2%+87.2%CGDVPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.9%+14.4%CGDVTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+93.0%+71.5%CGDVPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.8%14.7%TieSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation9.8%10.0%CGDV (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−21.1%−18.3%FNDXDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture93.8%86.4%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture88.1%92.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.930.93Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.860.90Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.850.71CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.281.03CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1340.128Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.800.79TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWDIWBThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+4.4% a year+0.4% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.700.28Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +9.4%−2.4% to +3.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.68−0.10Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.6%5.3%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

26%

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and FNDX hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

26% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGDV FNDX
Microsoft Corp 7.64% 2.82%
Apple Inc 2.21% 4.46%
Amazon.com Inc 2.00% 1.80%
Alphabet Inc 3.55% 1.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.19% 1.63%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 1.31% 2.42%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.27% 1.21%
Intel Corp 1.11% 1.42%
Micron Technology Inc 0.80% 0.97%
Wells Fargo & Co 0.93% 0.76%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.60% 0.73%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 0.68% 1.45%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGDV
British American Tobacco PLC 2.26%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 2.08%
TC Energy Corp 1.01%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 0.85%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 0.72%
Only in FNDX
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
Alphabet Inc 1.41%
Johnson & Johnson 1.06%
Bank of America Corp 1.01%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.01%
Valero Energy Corp 0.91%
Walmart Inc 0.88%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company
Total return, 1 year +15.8% +23.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) +13.1% (IWB)
Gap to its benchmark −11.7 pts vs IWD +10.8 pts vs IWB
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.25%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 88.4%
Holdings 53 731
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 $39.1bn $27.6bn

CGDV and FNDX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-98E4BA2197

CGDV and FNDX are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. CGDV follows No index, actively managed and FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company.
  2. Holdings in common. 26% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and FNDX +23.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGDV

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or FNDX?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and FNDX +23.9%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or FNDX?
FNDX is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and FNDX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of CGDV and 88% of FNDX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against FNDX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-fndx

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.