BAFE vs ESGU: Differences, Returns & Fees
BAFE and ESGU hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and ESGU returned +17.3% over the year. Net assets: $1.7bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF, and $18.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF.
ESGU costs 0.39 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.0 points; ESGU is 10.5 times larger.
| BAFE | ESGU | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.7bn | $17.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.3% | +17.3% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index |
| Holdings in common | 27% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.2% | 37.8% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BAFE and ESGU hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
27% in common
On the same fields
BAFE and ESGU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BAFE
BAFE is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%.
About ESGU
ESGU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 269 positions, with the top ten at 37.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BAFE or ESGU?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BAFE returned +12.3% and ESGU +17.3%.
- Which is cheaper, BAFE or ESGU?
- ESGU is cheaper, by 0.39 percentage points a year. That is about $39 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BAFE against ESGU, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bafe-vs-esgu
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BAFE against ESGU. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bafe-vs-esgu
[BAFE against ESGU (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bafe-vs-esgu)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.