BAFE vs DGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
BAFE and DGRW hold 28% of their weight in the same names, and DGRW returned +12.9% over the year. Net assets on Jun 30, 2026: $1.7bn for Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF and $16.6bn for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund.
DGRW costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points; DGRW is 9.8 times larger.
| BAFE | DGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.28% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.7bn | $16.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.3% | +12.9% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 28% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.2% | 36.1% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BAFE and DGRW hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
28% in common
On the same fields
BAFE and DGRW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BAFE
BAFE is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%.
About DGRW
DGRW tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BAFE or DGRW?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BAFE returned +12.3% and DGRW +12.9%.
- Which is cheaper, BAFE or DGRW?
- DGRW is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BAFE against DGRW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bafe-vs-dgrw
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BAFE against DGRW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bafe-vs-dgrw
[BAFE against DGRW (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bafe-vs-dgrw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.