DGRW vs QDPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
DGRW and QDPL hold 47% of their weight in the same names, and QDPL returned +16.3% over the year. Net assets: $16.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund, and $1.8bn on Oct 2, 2026 for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF.
DGRW costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points.
| DGRW | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, DGRW as of Jun 30, 2026 and QDPL as of Oct 2, 2026 | $16.6bn | $1.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.9% | +16.3% |
| What it tracks | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Index Series 400 |
| Holdings in common | 47% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 34.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and QDPL hold 47% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
47% in common
On the same fields
DGRW and QDPL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About DGRW
DGRW tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
About QDPL
QDPL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 513 positions, with the top ten at 34.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or QDPL?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.9% and QDPL +16.3%.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or QDPL?
- DGRW is cheaper, by 0.32 percentage points a year. That is about $32 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DGRW against QDPL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-qdpl
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DGRW against QDPL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-qdpl
[DGRW against QDPL (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-qdpl)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.