ACRT vs CAGE: which paid, and which earned it?
ACRT and CAGE both write options for income. ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF and Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF.
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.
SPY
+9.2%
CAGE
+14.4%
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.
SPY
+9.2%
CAGE
+14.4%
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.4%. CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACRT and CAGE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACRT | CAGE | ACRT | CAGE | ACRT | CAGE |
| 3 months | not published | +3.7% | not published | 0.0% | not published | +1.1 pts |
| Since launch ACRT Aug 2026 · CAGE Apr 2026 | −8.7% | +14.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0 pts | +5.2 pts |
ACRT and CAGE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACRT and CAGE on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACRT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
CAGE in plain words
Over the period since launch on Apr 16, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, CAGE paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +9.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.2 pts.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACRT against CAGE, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-cage
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACRT against CAGE, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-cage Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACRT against CAGE, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-cage
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACRT against CAGE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-cage
- Markdown
- [ACRT against CAGE (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-cage)