CAGE vs IACL: which paid, and which earned it?
CAGE and IACL both write options for income. Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF and GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF.
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.
SPY
+9.2%
CAGE
+14.4%
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.
SPY
+9.2%
CAGE
+14.4%
5.2 pts ahead of SPY
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
SPY
−0.4%
IACL
+1.1%
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
SPY
−0.4%
IACL
+1.1%
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
0.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.4%. IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CAGE | IACL | CAGE | IACL | CAGE | IACL |
| 3 months | +3.7% | not published | 0.0% | not published | +1.1 pts | not published |
| Since launch CAGE Apr 2026 · IACL Aug 2026 | +14.4% | +1.1% | 0.0% | 0.4% | +5.2 pts | +1.4 pts |
CAGE and IACL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
CAGE and IACL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CAGE in plain words
Over the period since launch on Apr 16, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, CAGE paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +9.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.2 pts.
IACL in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, IACL paid 0.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −0.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, CAGE against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cage-vs-iacl
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CAGE against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cage-vs-iacl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, CAGE against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cage-vs-iacl
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). CAGE against IACL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cage-vs-iacl
- Markdown
- [CAGE against IACL (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cage-vs-iacl)