IACL vs JANQ: which paid, and which earned it?

IACL and JANQ both write options for income. GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - January.

0.4%
IACL cash paid, since launch
0.0%
JANQ cash paid, since launch
+1.1%
IACL total return, since launch
0.0%
JANQ total return, since launch
IACL · since launch to Sep 30, 20261.4 pts ahead of SPY
IACL
+1.1%
SPY
−0.4%

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

SPY

−0.4%

IACL

+1.1%

0.4% as cash

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

SPY

−0.4%

IACL

+1.1%

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

0.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

JANQ · since launch to Sep 30, 20260.9 pts behind SPY
JANQ
0.0%
SPY
+0.9%

0.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

JANQ

0.0%

0.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

JANQ

0.0%

0.9 pts behind SPY

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.1%. JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowIACLJANQIACLJANQIACLJANQ
Since launch
IACL Aug 2026 · JANQ Sep 2026
+1.1%0.0%0.4%0.0%+1.4 pts−0.9 pts

IACL and JANQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

IACL
GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY
JANQ
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY
Issuer GraniteShares Innovator
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays not established not established
Payout rate, annualized 5.0% not published
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.4% (since launch on Aug 18, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +0.7% 0.0%
Total return, 1 year +1.1% (since launch on Aug 18, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year −0.4% +0.9%
Ahead or behind +1.4 pts −0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 99% not published
Age 43 days 20 days
Net assets $3m not published

IACL and JANQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IACL in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, IACL paid 0.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −0.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

JANQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, JANQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned 0.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, IACL or JANQ?
IACL charges 0.55% a year and JANQ charges 0.79%, so IACL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, IACL against JANQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iacl-vs-janq

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.