ACSP vs IACL: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and IACL both write options for income. ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF.
2.4 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
SPY
−1.5%
ACSP
−3.9%
2.4 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
2.4 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
SPY
−1.5%
ACSP
−3.9%
2.4 pts behind SPY
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
SPY
−0.4%
IACL
+1.1%
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
SPY
−0.4%
IACL
+1.1%
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
0.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.1%. IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACSP | IACL | ACSP | IACL | ACSP | IACL |
| Since launch ACSP Aug 2026 · IACL Aug 2026 | −3.9% | +1.1% | 0.0% | 0.4% | −2.4 pts | +1.4 pts |
ACSP and IACL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACSP and IACL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.4 pts.
IACL in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, IACL paid 0.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −0.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACSP against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-iacl
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-iacl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACSP against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-iacl
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACSP against IACL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-iacl
- Markdown
- [ACSP against IACL (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-iacl)