APRH vs IACL: which paid, and which earned it?
APRH and IACL both write options for income. Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF -- April and GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF.
9.1 pts behind SPY
APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.1%, total +6.7%, SPY +15.7%, −9.1 pts.
SPY
+15.7%
APRH
+6.7%
6.4% of it arrived as cash
9.1 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
9.1 pts behind SPY
APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.1%, total +6.7%, SPY +15.7%, −9.1 pts.
SPY
+15.7%
APRH
+6.7%
9.1 pts behind SPY
6.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. APRH over 1 year: paid 6.4%, price +0.1%, total +6.7%, SPY +15.7%, −9.1 pts.
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
SPY
−0.4%
IACL
+1.1%
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
SPY
−0.4%
IACL
+1.1%
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
0.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | APRH | IACL | APRH | IACL | APRH | IACL |
| 3 months | +1.4% | not published | 2.1% | not published | −1.1 pts | not published |
| 6 months | +5.2% | not published | 4.3% | not published | −11.8 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +6.7% | not published | 6.4% | not published | −9.1 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +23.3% | not published | 20.3% | not published | −61.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch APRH Apr 2023 · IACL Aug 2026 | +28.7% | +1.1% | 24.3% | 0.4% | −65.1 pts | +1.4 pts |
APRH and IACL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
APRH and IACL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
APRH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, APRH paid 6.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.1 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.4%, paid quarterly.
IACL in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, IACL paid 0.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −0.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, APRH against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aprh-vs-iacl
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, APRH against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aprh-vs-iacl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, APRH against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aprh-vs-iacl
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). APRH against IACL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aprh-vs-iacl
- Markdown
- [APRH against IACL (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/aprh-vs-iacl)