ACII vs IACL: which paid, and which earned it?

ACII and IACL both write options for income. Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF and GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF.

3.8%
ACII cash paid, since launch
0.4%
IACL cash paid, since launch
+1.6%
ACII total return, since launch
+1.1%
IACL total return, since launch
ACII · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY
ACII
+1.6%
SPY
+1.6%

About even with SPY

ACII since launch: paid 3.8%, price −2.3%, total +1.6%, SPY +1.6%, +0.1 pts.

SPY

+1.6%

ACII

+1.6%

3.8% of it arrived as cash

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACII since launch: paid 3.8%, price −2.3%, total +1.6%, SPY +1.6%, +0.1 pts.

SPY

+1.6%

ACII

+1.6%

3.8% as cash

about even with SPY

3.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACII since launch: paid 3.8%, price −2.3%, total +1.6%, SPY +1.6%, +0.1 pts.

IACL · since launch to Sep 30, 20261.4 pts ahead of SPY
IACL
+1.1%
SPY
−0.4%

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

SPY

−0.4%

IACL

+1.1%

0.4% as cash

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

SPY

−0.4%

IACL

+1.1%

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

0.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.6%. IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACIIIACLACIIIACLACIIIACL
3 months+1.7%not published2.4%not published−0.8 ptsnot published
Since launch
ACII May 2026 · IACL Aug 2026
+1.6%+1.1%3.8%0.4%+0.1 pts+1.4 pts

ACII and IACL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACII
Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF · Autocallable on SPY, paying monthly
IACL
GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY
Issuer Innovator GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Pays monthly not established
Payout rate, annualized 9.8% 5.0%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.55%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.8% (since launch on May 28, 2026) 0.4% (since launch on Aug 18, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −2.3% +0.7%
Total return, 1 year +1.6% (since launch on May 28, 2026) +1.1% (since launch on Aug 18, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +1.6% −0.4%
Ahead or behind +0.1 pts +1.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 99%
Age 125 days 43 days
Net assets $136m $3m

ACII and IACL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACII in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 28, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACII paid 3.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +1.6% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.8%, paid monthly.

IACL in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, IACL paid 0.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −0.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACII or IACL?
ACII charges 0.79% a year and IACL charges 0.55%, so IACL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACII against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acii-vs-iacl

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.