CAIQ vs IACL: which paid, and which earned it?

CAIQ and IACL both write options for income. Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF.

13.7%
CAIQ cash paid, since launch
0.4%
IACL cash paid, since launch
+19.6%
CAIQ total return, since launch
+1.1%
IACL total return, since launch
CAIQ · since launch to Sep 30, 20267.3 pts behind QQQ
CAIQ
+19.6%
QQQ
+26.9%

7.3 pts behind QQQ

CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.

QQQ

+26.9%

CAIQ

+19.6%

13.7% of it arrived as cash

7.3 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

7.3 pts behind QQQ

CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.

QQQ

+26.9%

CAIQ

+19.6%

7.3 pts behind QQQ

13.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.

IACL · since launch to Sep 30, 20261.4 pts ahead of SPY
IACL
+1.1%
SPY
−0.4%

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

SPY

−0.4%

IACL

+1.1%

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

SPY

−0.4%

IACL

+1.1%

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

0.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowCAIQIACLCAIQIACLCAIQIACL
3 months+2.6%not published2.9%not published+0.5 ptsnot published
6 months+18.4%not published8.0%not published−8.4 ptsnot published
Since launch
CAIQ Nov 2025 · IACL Aug 2026
+19.6%+1.1%13.7%0.4%−7.3 pts+1.4 pts

CAIQ and IACL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CAIQ
Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on QQQ, paying monthly
IACL
GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY
Issuer Calamos GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Pays monthly not established
Payout rate, annualized 17.5% 5.0%
Expense ratio 0.74% 0.55%
Cash paid, 1 year 13.7% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025) 0.4% (since launch on Aug 18, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +4.7% +0.7%
Total return, 1 year +19.6% (since launch on Nov 20, 2025) +1.1% (since launch on Aug 18, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +26.9% −0.4%
Ahead or behind −7.3 pts +1.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 99%
Age 314 days 43 days
Net assets $167m $3m

CAIQ and IACL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CAIQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Nov 20, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026, CAIQ paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.3 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.5%, paid monthly.

IACL in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, IACL paid 0.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −0.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, CAIQ or IACL?
CAIQ charges 0.74% a year and IACL charges 0.55%, so IACL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, CAIQ against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/caiq-vs-iacl

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.