Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
IACL vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
IACL costs 0.15 points a year less.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | IACL | MPIM |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Price change | rose 0.2% (since Aug 18, 2026) | fell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.70% |
| Net assets | $1.3m | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Not measured
IACL since launch: paid 1.6%, price +0.2%, total +1.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
IACL
+1.8%
1.6% cash
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
IACL since launch: paid 1.6%, price +0.2%, total +1.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
IACL
+1.8%
1.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. IACL since launch: paid 1.6%, price +0.2%, total +1.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Not measured
MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPIM
−10.0%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPIM
−10.0%
3.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | IACL | MPIM | IACL | MPIM | IACL | MPIM |
| 3 months | – | −10.6% | – | 3.0% | – | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: IACL Aug 2026 · MPIM Aug 2026 | +1.8% | −10.0% | 1.6% | 3.0% | not measured | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
IACL
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 18, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, IACL paid 1.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.8%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
MPIM
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IACL against MPIM, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iacl-vs-mpim
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). IACL against MPIM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iacl-vs-mpim
[IACL against MPIM (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/iacl-vs-mpim)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
IACL and MPIM both write options for income.
IACL and MPIM
Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 month.
IACL +0.4%, MPIM −9.4%: IACL +9.8 pts ahead, 1 month, Oct 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.