Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

LAPR vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+11.5 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: LAPR ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.09 pts
A year: LAPR 0.79%, MPIM 0.70%, per filings dated Apr 1, 2026 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

MPIM costs 0.09 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

LAPR vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureLAPRMPIM
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+6.0%not published
Price changefell 0.3% (1 year)fell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)
Return of capital, issuer estimate57% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkVanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOOnot published
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.70%
Net assets$11mnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
6.1%
LAPR cash paid, 1 year
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+6.0%
LAPR total return, 1 year
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
LAPR · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 6.1 pts behind VOO
LAPR
+6.0%
VOO
+12.1%

6.1 pts behind VOO

LAPR over 1 year: paid 6.1%, price −0.3%, total +6.0%, VOO +12.1%, −6.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

VOO

+12.1%

LAPR

+6.0%

6.1% as cash

6.1 pts behind VOO

Total return, distributions reinvested

6.1 pts behind VOO

LAPR over 1 year: paid 6.1%, price −0.3%, total +6.0%, VOO +12.1%, −6.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

VOO

+12.1%

LAPR

+6.0%

6.1 pts behind VOO

6.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. LAPR over 1 year: paid 6.1%, price −0.3%, total +6.0%, VOO +12.1%, −6.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

LAPR Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April · Buffer with income on VOO, paying monthly MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable
Issuer Innovator m+
Strategy buffer with income autocallable
Benchmark Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) not set
Pays monthly not established
Payout rate, annualized 6.7% 17.0%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.70%
Cash paid, 1 year 6.1% 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −0.3% −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Total return, 1 year +6.0% −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +12.1% not published
Ahead or behind −6.1 pts not available
Return of capital, latest estimate 57% not published
Age 2.6 years 92 days
Net assets $11m not read by ETFIQ

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: LAPR vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowLAPRMPIMLAPRMPIMLAPRMPIM
3 months+0.9%−10.6%1.7%3.0%+3.3 ptsnot measured
6 months+2.3%–3.3%–+0.5 pts–
1 year+6.0%–6.1%–−6.1 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: LAPR Apr 2024 · MPIM Aug 2026+16.8%−10.0%15.0%3.0%−32.7 ptsnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

LAPR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
LAPR

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, LAPR paid 6.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +12.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.1 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly. Innovator estimates that 57% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, LAPR or MPIM?
LAPR charges 0.79% a year and MPIM charges 0.70%, so MPIM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, LAPR against MPIM, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lapr-vs-mpim

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

LAPR and MPIM both write options for income.

Growth of 100

LAPR and MPIM

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

LAPR +0.9%MPIM −10.6%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

LAPR +0.9%, MPIM −10.6%: LAPR +11.5 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.