Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

LJUL vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+11.4 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: LJUL ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.09 pts
A year: LJUL 0.79%, MPIM 0.70%, per filings dated Jul 1, 2026 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

MPIM costs 0.09 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

LJUL vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureLJULMPIM
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+4.9%not published
Price changefell 0.5% (1 year)fell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)
Return of capital, issuer estimate40% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkVanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOOnot published
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.70%
Net assets$9.0mnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
5.2%
LJUL cash paid, 1 year
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+4.9%
LJUL total return, 1 year
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
LJUL · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 7.2 pts behind VOO
LJUL
+4.9%
VOO
+12.1%

7.2 pts behind VOO

LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price −0.5%, total +4.9%, VOO +12.1%, −7.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

VOO

+12.1%

LJUL

+4.9%

5.2% as cash

7.2 pts behind VOO

Total return, distributions reinvested

7.2 pts behind VOO

LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price −0.5%, total +4.9%, VOO +12.1%, −7.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

VOO

+12.1%

LJUL

+4.9%

7.2 pts behind VOO

5.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price −0.5%, total +4.9%, VOO +12.1%, −7.2 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July · Buffer with income on VOO, paying monthly MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable
Issuer Innovator m+
Strategy buffer with income autocallable
Benchmark Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) not set
Pays monthly not established
Payout rate, annualized 5.3% 17.0%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.70%
Cash paid, 1 year 5.2% 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −0.5% −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Total return, 1 year +4.9% −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +12.1% not published
Ahead or behind −7.2 pts not available
Return of capital, latest estimate 40% not published
Age 2.4 years 92 days
Net assets $9.0m not read by ETFIQ

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: LJUL vs MPIM: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowLJULMPIMLJULMPIMLJULMPIM
3 months+0.8%−10.6%1.3%3.0%+3.2 ptsnot measured
6 months+2.3%–2.6%–+0.6 pts–
1 year+4.9%–5.2%–−7.2 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: LJUL Jul 2024 · MPIM Aug 2026+13.8%−10.0%12.6%3.0%−28.9 ptsnot measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

LJUL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
LJUL

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, LJUL paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.9%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +12.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.2 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid monthly. Innovator estimates that 40% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, LJUL or MPIM?
LJUL charges 0.79% a year and MPIM charges 0.70%, so MPIM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, LJUL against MPIM, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ljul-vs-mpim

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

LJUL and MPIM both write options for income.

Growth of 100

LJUL and MPIM

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

LJUL +0.8%MPIM −10.6%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

LJUL +0.8%, MPIM −10.6%: LJUL +11.4 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.