Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

LJUL vs OARK: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OARK paid 33.3% of its price in cash against LJUL’s 5.2%, though LJUL returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about LJUL and OARK

Net assets: $9.0m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July, and $38m on Nov 3, 2026 for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF.

At a glance
5.2%
LJUL cash paid, 1 year
33.3%
OARK cash paid, 1 year
+5.3%
LJUL total return, 1 year
−2.6%
OARK total return, 1 year
LJUL · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.5 pts behind VOO
LJUL
+5.3%
VOO
+14.8%

9.5 pts behind VOO

LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price 0.0%, total +5.3%, VOO +14.8%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LJUL

+5.3%

5.2% as cash

9.5 pts behind VOO

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.5 pts behind VOO

LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price 0.0%, total +5.3%, VOO +14.8%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

VOO

+14.8%

LJUL

+5.3%

9.5 pts behind VOO

5.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. LJUL over 1 year: paid 5.2%, price 0.0%, total +5.3%, VOO +14.8%, −9.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
OARK · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.1 pts ahead of ARKK
OARK
−2.6%
ARKK
−3.7%

1.1 pts ahead of ARKK

OARK over 1 year: paid 33.3%, price −36.6%, total −2.6%, ARKK −3.7%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

ARKK

−3.7%

OARK

−2.6%

1.1 pts ahead of ARKK

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.1 pts ahead of ARKK

OARK over 1 year: paid 33.3%, price −36.6%, total −2.6%, ARKK −3.7%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

ARKK

−3.7%

OARK

−2.6%

1.1 pts ahead of ARKK

33.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. OARK over 1 year: paid 33.3%, price −36.6%, total −2.6%, ARKK −3.7%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

LJUL costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.9 points; OARK is 4.3 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

LJUL vs OARK: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureLJULOARK
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+5.3%−2.6%
Price change, 1 yearfell 0.0%fell 36.6%
Return of capital, issuer estimate40% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkVanguard S&P 500 ETF, measured through VOOARK Innovation ETF, measured through ARKK
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%1.00%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$8.9m$38m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · LJUL scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score57.8LJUL15.3OARK

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, LJUL and OARK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first LJUL OARK
Only in one fund ↓
Only in LJUL
Only in OARK
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 31.70%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 25.99%
2ARKK US 11/20/26 C85.01 FLX 1.48%
ARKK US 11/06/26 C83 0.25%
ARKK US 11/06/26 C84 0.07%
ARKK US 11/06/26 C82 -0.16%
ARKK US 11/06/26 C81 -0.68%
2ARKK US 11/20/26 P85.01 FLX -7.39%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July · Buffer with income on VOO, paying monthly OARK YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF · Synthetic covered call on ARKK, paying weekly
Strategy buffer with income synthetic covered call
Benchmark Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK)
Pays monthly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 5.3% 31.8%
Expense ratio 0.79% 1.00%
Cash paid, 1 year 5.2% 33.3%
Price change, 1 year 0.0% −36.6%
Total return, 1 year +5.3% −2.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% −3.7%
Ahead or behind −9.5 pts +1.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 40% not published
Age 2.3 years 3.9 years
Net assets, LJUL as of Nov 4, 2026 and OARK as of Nov 3, 2026 $9.0m $38m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: LJUL vs OARK: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowLJULOARKLJULOARKLJULOARK
3 months+1.1%+1.6%1.3%8.3%+1.3 pts−3.9 pts
6 months+2.8%−2.3%2.6%17.8%−2.3 pts−3.3 pts
1 year+5.3%−2.6%5.2%33.3%−9.5 pts+1.1 pts
3 years–+62.6%–95.8%–−36.1 pts
Since launchNot the same days: LJUL Jul 2024 · OARK Nov 2022+14.0%+47.8%12.6%90.4%−30.5 pts−75.3 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

LJUL and OARK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
LJUL

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LJUL paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.3%. Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.5 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.3%, paid monthly. Innovator estimates that 40% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

OARK

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OARK paid 33.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 36.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.6%. ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) returned −3.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 31.8%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, LJUL or OARK?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LJUL paid 5.2% of its starting price in cash and OARK paid 33.3%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, LJUL or OARK?
With every distribution reinvested, LJUL returned +5.3% and OARK −2.6% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, LJUL or OARK?
LJUL charges 0.79% a year and OARK charges 1.00%, so LJUL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, LJUL against OARK, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ljul-vs-oark

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.