Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

MPIM vs XSHP: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+15.3 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: XSHP ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.29 pts
A year: MPIM 0.70%, XSHP 0.99%, per filings dated Jun 17, 2026 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

MPIM costs 0.29 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MPIM vs XSHP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureMPIMXSHP
Paid and earned
Price changefell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)fell 30.0% (since Jun 17, 2026)
Return of capital, issuer estimate92% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.70%0.99%
Net assetsnot read by ETFIQ$11m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
11.3%
XSHP cash paid, since launch, Jun 17, 2026
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
−17.9%
XSHP total return, since launch, Jun 17, 2026
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
XSHP · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
XSHP
−17.9%
none

Not measured

XSHP since launch: paid 11.3%, price −30.0%, total −17.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

XSHP

−17.9%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

XSHP since launch: paid 11.3%, price −30.0%, total −17.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

XSHP

−17.9%

11.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XSHP since launch: paid 11.3%, price −30.0%, total −17.9%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable XSHP Kurv SpaceX Enhanced Income ETF · Covered call, paying monthly
Issuer m+ Kurv
Strategy autocallable covered call
Benchmark not set not set
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 17.0% 32.4%
Expense ratio 0.70% 0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) 11.3% (since launch, Jun 17, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) −30.0% (since launch, Jun 17, 2026)
Total return, 1 year −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) −17.9% (since launch, Jun 17, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year not published not published
Ahead or behind not available not available
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 92%
Age 92 days 148 days
Net assets not read by ETFIQ $11m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MPIM vs XSHP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMPIMXSHPMPIMXSHPMPIMXSHP
3 months−10.6%+4.7%3.0%8.6%not measurednot measured
Since launchNot the same days: MPIM Aug 2026 · XSHP Jun 2026−10.0%−17.9%3.0%11.3%not measurednot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

XSHP

Over the period from its first trade on Jun 17, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, XSHP paid 11.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −17.9%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 32.4%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 92% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MPIM or XSHP?
MPIM charges 0.70% a year and XSHP charges 0.99%, so MPIM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MPIM against XSHP, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mpim-vs-xshp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

MPIM and XSHP both write options for income.

Growth of 100

MPIM and XSHP

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

MPIM −10.6%XSHP +4.7%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

MPIM −10.6%, XSHP +4.7%: XSHP +15.3 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.