ACQQ vs IACL: which paid, and which earned it?
ACQQ and IACL both write options for income. ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF.
About even with QQQ
ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.
QQQ
+1.3%
ACQQ
+1.6%
about even with QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with QQQ
ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.
QQQ
+1.3%
ACQQ
+1.6%
about even with QQQ
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
SPY
−0.4%
IACL
+1.1%
0.4% as cash
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
SPY
−0.4%
IACL
+1.1%
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
0.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.6%. IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACQQ | IACL | ACQQ | IACL | ACQQ | IACL |
| Since launch ACQQ Aug 2026 · IACL Aug 2026 | +1.6% | +1.1% | 0.0% | 0.4% | +0.3 pts | +1.4 pts |
ACQQ and IACL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACQQ and IACL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +1.3% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
IACL in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, IACL paid 0.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −0.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACQQ against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-iacl
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACQQ against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-iacl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACQQ against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-iacl
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACQQ against IACL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-iacl
- Markdown
- [ACQQ against IACL (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-iacl)