CAGE vs JANQ: which paid, and which earned it?

CAGE and JANQ both write options for income. Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - January.

0.0%
CAGE cash paid, since launch
0.0%
JANQ cash paid, since launch
+14.4%
CAGE total return, since launch
0.0%
JANQ total return, since launch
CAGE · since launch to Sep 30, 20265.2 pts ahead of SPY
CAGE
+14.4%
SPY
+9.2%

5.2 pts ahead of SPY

CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.

SPY

+9.2%

CAGE

+14.4%

5.2 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

5.2 pts ahead of SPY

CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.

SPY

+9.2%

CAGE

+14.4%

5.2 pts ahead of SPY

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.

JANQ · since launch to Sep 30, 20260.9 pts behind SPY
JANQ
0.0%
SPY
+0.9%

0.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

JANQ

0.0%

0.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

JANQ

0.0%

0.9 pts behind SPY

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.4%. JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowCAGEJANQCAGEJANQCAGEJANQ
3 months+3.7%not published0.0%not published+1.1 ptsnot published
Since launch
CAGE Apr 2026 · JANQ Sep 2026
+14.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%+5.2 pts−0.9 pts

CAGE and JANQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CAGE
Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF · Autocallable on SPY
JANQ
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY
Issuer Calamos Innovator
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays not established not established
Payout rate, annualized not published not published
Expense ratio 0.74% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.0% (since launch on Apr 16, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +14.4% 0.0%
Total return, 1 year +14.4% (since launch on Apr 16, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +9.2% +0.9%
Ahead or behind +5.2 pts −0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 167 days 20 days
Net assets $14m not published

CAGE and JANQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CAGE in plain words

Over the period since launch on Apr 16, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, CAGE paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +9.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.2 pts.

JANQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, JANQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned 0.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, CAGE or JANQ?
CAGE charges 0.74% a year and JANQ charges 0.79%, so CAGE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, CAGE against JANQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cage-vs-janq

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.