ACRT vs OCTH: which paid, and which earned it?
ACRT and OCTH both write options for income. ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - October.
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
10 pts behind SPY
OCTH over 1 year: paid 6.5%, price −0.9%, total +5.7%, SPY +15.7%, −10.0 pts.
SPY
+15.7%
OCTH
+5.7%
6.5% as cash
10 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
10 pts behind SPY
OCTH over 1 year: paid 6.5%, price −0.9%, total +5.7%, SPY +15.7%, −10.0 pts.
SPY
+15.7%
OCTH
+5.7%
10 pts behind SPY
6.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. OCTH over 1 year: paid 6.5%, price −0.9%, total +5.7%, SPY +15.7%, −10.0 pts.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACRT and OCTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACRT | OCTH | ACRT | OCTH | ACRT | OCTH |
| 3 months | not published | +0.9% | not published | 1.6% | not published | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +4.5% | not published | 3.3% | not published | −12.5 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +5.7% | not published | 6.5% | not published | −10.0 pts |
| Since launch ACRT Aug 2026 · OCTH Oct 2023 | −8.7% | +22.8% | 0.0% | 20.7% | 0.0 pts | −62.3 pts |
ACRT and OCTH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACRT and OCTH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACRT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
OCTH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, OCTH paid 6.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACRT against OCTH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-octh
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACRT against OCTH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-octh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACRT against OCTH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-octh
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACRT against OCTH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-octh
- Markdown
- [ACRT against OCTH (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-octh)