Which paid more, ACRT or ACSP?

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting price in cash and ACSP paid 0.0%, so ACRT paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACRT or ACSP?

With every distribution reinvested, ACRT returned −8.7% and ACSP −3.9% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.

Which is cheaper, ACRT or ACSP?

ACRT charges 0.72% a year and ACSP charges 0.72%, so ACRT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

ACRT vs ACSP: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the window both share ACRT paid 0.0% of its price in cash against ACSP’s 0.0%, though ACSP returned more with it reinvested. ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF.

0.0%

ACRT cash paid, since launch

0.0%

ACSP cash paid, since launch

−8.7%

ACRT total return, since launch

−3.9%

ACSP total return, since launch

ACRT · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with IWM

ACRT

−8.7%

IWM

−8.7%

About even with IWM

ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

IWM

−8.7%

ACRT

−8.7%

about even with IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with IWM

ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

IWM

−8.7%

ACRT

−8.7%

about even with IWM

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

ACSP · since launch to Sep 30, 20262.4 pts behind SPY

ACSP

−3.9%

SPY

−1.5%

2.4 pts behind SPY

ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.

SPY

−1.5%

ACSP

−3.9%

2.4 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.4 pts behind SPY

ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.

SPY

−1.5%

ACSP

−3.9%

2.4 pts behind SPY

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to −1.5%. ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACRT and ACSP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding ACRT ACSP

Only in ACRT

RU2K LADDERED AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%

Only in ACSP

S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACRT	ACSP	ACRT	ACSP	ACRT	ACSP
Since launch ACRT Aug 2026 · ACSP Aug 2026	−8.7%	−3.9%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0 pts	−2.4 pts

ACRT and ACSP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACRT

ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on IWM

ACSP

ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY

Issuer ProShares ProShares

Strategy autocallable autocallable

Benchmark Russell 2000 (IWM) S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays not established not established

Payout rate, annualized not published not published

Expense ratio 0.72% 0.72%

Cash paid, 1 year 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)

Price change, 1 year −8.7% −3.9%

Total return, 1 year −8.7% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) −3.9% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year −8.7% −1.5%

Ahead or behind 0.0 pts −2.4 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 47 days 47 days

Net assets $1m $27m

ACRT and ACSP on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACRT in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.

ACSP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.4 pts.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACRT or ACSP?: Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting price in cash and ACSP paid 0.0%, so ACRT paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACRT or ACSP?: With every distribution reinvested, ACRT returned −8.7% and ACSP −3.9% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.
Which is cheaper, ACRT or ACSP?: ACRT charges 0.72% a year and ACSP charges 0.72%, so ACRT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACRT vs OCTH ACRT vs OCTJ ACRT vs OVS ACRT vs RDTE ACSP vs DDDD ACSP vs DIVO ACSP vs DJIA ACSP vs DOGG

Russell 2000 (IWM) →S&P 500 (SPY) →ACRT on its own →ACSP on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACRT and ACSP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACRT and ACSP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗ProShares page for ACRT ↗ProShares page for ACSP ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACRT against ACSP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-acsp

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.