Data as of .
ACSP vs TPAY: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and TPAY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and TPAY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACSP | Only in TPAY |
|---|---|
| S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | SPY 03/12/2027 33.67 C 61.75% |
| SPY 04/16/2027 33.18 C 33.20% | |
| SPYM 03/12/2027 3.33 C 5.05% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSP | TPAY | ACSP | TPAY | ACSP | TPAY | |
| 3 months | not published | +1.5% | not published | 2.4% | not published | −0.8 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +17.3% | not published | 5.3% | not published | −0.7 pts |
| Since launch | −3.8% | +11.0% | 0.0% | 5.8% | −2.1 pts | −0.8 pts |
| ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on SPY | TPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | Roundhill |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 9.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.49% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 5.8% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.8% | +4.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | −3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +11.0% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.6% | +11.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.1 pts | −0.8 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 35 days | 212 days |
| Net assets | $27m | $2m |
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.
TPAY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 18, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, TPAY paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +11.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.5%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACSP or TPAY?
- ACSP charges 0.72% a year and TPAY charges 0.49%, so TPAY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against TPAY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-tpay Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.