Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

ACSP vs FTQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

ACSP and FTQI both write options for income.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ACSP and FTQI

Net assets: $57m on Nov 4, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF, and $997m on Nov 3, 2026 for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF.

At a glance
10.4%
ACSP cash paid, since launch, Aug 14, 2026
12.1%
FTQI cash paid, 1 year
−6.8%
ACSP total return, since launch, Aug 14, 2026
+16.5%
FTQI total return, 1 year
ACSP · since launch to Nov 4, 2026 5.8 pts behind SPY
ACSP
−6.8%
SPY
−1.0%

5.8 pts behind SPY

ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

−1.0%

ACSP

−6.8%

5.8 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

5.8 pts behind SPY

ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

−1.0%

ACSP

−6.8%

5.8 pts behind SPY

10.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
FTQI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 4.2 pts ahead of QQQ
FTQI
+16.5%
QQQ
+12.3%

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

FTQI over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price +3.5%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

FTQI

+16.5%

12.1% of it arrived as cash

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

FTQI over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price +3.5%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

FTQI

+16.5%

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

12.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. FTQI over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price +3.5%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

ACSP costs 0.03 points a year less; FTQI is 18.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACSP vs FTQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureACSPFTQI
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 yearnot published+16.5%
Price changefell 16.9% (since Aug 14, 2026)rose 3.5% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate98% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment99% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYNasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.72%0.75%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$55m$997m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and FTQI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ACSP FTQI
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ACSP
S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.01%
Only in FTQI
Apple Inc. 8.98%
NVIDIA Corporation 6.22%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.73%
Amazon.com, Inc. 4.23%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.10%
Tesla, Inc. 3.05%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 2.67%
Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 2.60%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
Strategy autocallable covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 17.5% 12.3%
Expense ratio 0.72% 0.75%
Cash paid, 1 year 10.4% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) 12.1%
Price change, 1 year −16.9% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) +3.5%
Total return, 1 year −6.8% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) +16.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year −1.0% (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) +12.3%
Ahead or behind −5.8 pts (since launch, Aug 14, 2026) +4.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 98% 99%
Age 82 days 12.8 years
Net assets, ACSP as of Nov 4, 2026 and FTQI as of Nov 3, 2026 $57m $997m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ACSP vs FTQI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACSPFTQIACSPFTQIACSPFTQI
3 months–+0.4%–3.0%–+3.8 pts
6 months–+6.6%–6.0%–+6.9 pts
1 year–+16.5%–12.1%–+4.3 pts
3 years–+60.8%–38.1%–−30.5 pts
Since launchNot the same days: ACSP Aug 2026 · FTQI Jan 2014−6.8%+138.8%10.4%81.1%−5.8 pts−641.3 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

ACSP and FTQI flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ACSP

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, ACSP paid 10.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 16.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −6.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.5%, paid periodically. ProShares estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

FTQI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FTQI paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.3%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACSP or FTQI?
ACSP charges 0.72% a year and FTQI charges 0.75%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACSP against FTQI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-ftqi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.