Data as of .
ACSP vs TDAQ: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and TDAQ both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and TDAQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACSP | Only in TDAQ |
|---|---|
| S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF 100.00% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSP | TDAQ | ACSP | TDAQ | ACSP | TDAQ | |
| 3 months | not published | −1.0% | not published | 4.1% | not published | +1.5 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +22.7% | not published | 9.7% | not published | −1.6 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +22.8% | not published | 17.4% | not published | +1.0 pts |
| Since launch | −3.8% | +27.2% | 0.0% | 18.0% | −2.1 pts | +1.2 pts |
| ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on SPY | TDAQ TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | TappAlpha |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 17.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.83% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 17.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.8% | +3.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | −3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +22.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.6% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.1 pts | +1.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 35 days | 379 days |
| Net assets | $27m | $248m |
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.
TDAQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TDAQ paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.8%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACSP or TDAQ?
- ACSP charges 0.72% a year and TDAQ charges 0.83%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against TDAQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-tdaq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.