Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CVRD vs TDAQ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year TDAQ paid 17.4% of its price in cash against CVRD’s 7.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Madison Covered Call ETF and TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF.

7.4%CVRD cash paid, 1 year
17.4%TDAQ cash paid, 1 year
+5.6%CVRD total return, 1 year
+22.8%TDAQ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: TDAQ scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

CVRD 35.5TDAQ 74.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CVRD11 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%CVRD+5.6%7.4% as cash11 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%CVRD+5.6%11 pts behind SPY
TDAQ1 pt ahead of QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%TDAQ+22.8%17.4% of it arrived as cash1 pt ahead of QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%TDAQ+22.8%17.4% as cash1 pt ahead of QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CVRD and TDAQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in CVRDOnly in TDAQ
Palo Alto Networks Inc 4.84%Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF 100.00%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 4.58%
Danaher Corp 4.32%
Amazon.com Inc 4.06%
Agilent Technologies Inc 3.98%
Microsoft Corp 3.88%
Visa Inc 3.68%
Broadcom Inc 3.57%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

CVRD and TDAQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
CVRDTDAQCVRDTDAQCVRDTDAQ
3 months+4.0%−1.0%1.7%4.1%+1.7 pts+1.5 pts
6 months+5.7%+22.7%3.3%9.7%−12.3 pts−1.6 pts
1 year+5.6%+22.8%7.4%17.4%−11.0 pts+1.0 pts
3 years+19.5%not published25.9%not published−58.9 ptsnot published
Since launch+21.1%+27.2%26.3%18.0%−59.8 pts+1.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CVRD and TDAQ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CVRD
Madison Covered Call ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying quarterly
TDAQ
TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerMadisonTappAlpha
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyNasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy
Paysquarterlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized6.5%17.1%
Expense ratio0.92%0.83%
Cash paid, 1 year7.4%17.4%
Price change, 1 year−2.2%+3.4%
Total return, 1 year+5.6%+22.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−11.0 pts+1.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1123 days379 days
Net assets$32m$248m

CVRD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CVRD paid 7.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly.

TDAQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TDAQ paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.8%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.1%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, CVRD or TDAQ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CVRD paid 7.4% of its starting price in cash and TDAQ paid 17.4%, so TDAQ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, CVRD or TDAQ?
With every distribution reinvested, CVRD returned +5.6% and TDAQ returned +22.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so TDAQ returned more.
Which is cheaper, CVRD or TDAQ?
CVRD charges 0.92% a year and TDAQ charges 0.83%, so TDAQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CVRD against TDAQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CVRD against TDAQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/cvrd-vs-tdaq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources