Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

RNTY vs TDAQ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year TDAQ paid 17.4% of its price in cash against RNTY’s 11.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Real Estate Option Income ETF and TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF.

11.9%RNTY cash paid, 1 year
17.4%TDAQ cash paid, 1 year
+4.6%RNTY total return, 1 year
+22.8%TDAQ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: TDAQ scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

RNTY 25.5TDAQ 74.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

RNTY12 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%RNTY+4.6%11.9% as cash12 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%RNTY+4.6%12 pts behind SPY
TDAQ1 pt ahead of QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%TDAQ+22.8%17.4% of it arrived as cash1 pt ahead of QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%TDAQ+22.8%17.4% as cash1 pt ahead of QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RNTY and TDAQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in RNTYOnly in TDAQ
Prologis Inc 6.72%Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF 100.00%
Welltower Inc 6.63%
Vivmark Residential 6.31%
Digital Realty Trust Inc 5.99%
Simon Property Group Inc 5.30%
Equinix Inc 4.92%
St Joe Co/The 4.41%
Realty Income Corp 4.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

RNTY and TDAQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
RNTYTDAQRNTYTDAQRNTYTDAQ
3 months−2.3%−1.0%3.0%4.1%−4.5 pts+1.5 pts
6 months+2.5%+22.7%6.2%9.7%−15.6 pts−1.6 pts
1 year+4.6%+22.8%11.9%17.4%−12.0 pts+1.0 pts
Since launch+7.9%+27.2%15.8%18.0%−39.2 pts+1.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
RNTY and TDAQ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RNTY
YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Real Estate Option Income ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying monthly
TDAQ
TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxTappAlpha
Strategysynthetic covered calloption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyNasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized12.5%17.1%
Expense ratio0.99%0.83%
Cash paid, 1 year11.9%17.4%
Price change, 1 year−7.3%+3.4%
Total return, 1 year+4.6%+22.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−12.0 pts+1.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate0%not published
Age519 days379 days
Net assets$6m$248m

RNTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, RNTY paid 11.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.5%, paid monthly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

TDAQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TDAQ paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.8%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.1%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, RNTY or TDAQ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, RNTY paid 11.9% of its starting price in cash and TDAQ paid 17.4%, so TDAQ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, RNTY or TDAQ?
With every distribution reinvested, RNTY returned +4.6% and TDAQ returned +22.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so TDAQ returned more.
Which is cheaper, RNTY or TDAQ?
RNTY charges 0.99% a year and TDAQ charges 0.83%, so TDAQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RNTY against TDAQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RNTY against TDAQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/rnty-vs-tdaq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources