Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QQQI vs RNTY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QQQI paid 15.2% of its price in cash against RNTY’s 11.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF and YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Real Estate Option Income ETF.

15.2%QQQI cash paid, 1 year
11.9%RNTY cash paid, 1 year
+16.4%QQQI total return, 1 year
+4.6%RNTY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QQQI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QQQI 50.5RNTY 25.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QQQI5.3 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QQQI+16.4%15.2% of it arrived as cash5.3 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QQQI+16.4%15.2% as cash5.3 pts behind QQQ
RNTY12 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%RNTY+4.6%11.9% as cash12 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%RNTY+4.6%12 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQI and RNTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QQQIOnly in RNTY
NVIDIA Corp 8.58%Prologis Inc 6.72%
Apple Inc 7.79%Welltower Inc 6.63%
Microsoft Corp 5.84%Vivmark Residential 6.31%
Micron Technology Inc 5.03%Digital Realty Trust Inc 5.99%
Amazon.com Inc 4.36%Simon Property Group Inc 5.30%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.02%Equinix Inc 4.92%
Alphabet Inc 3.24%St Joe Co/The 4.41%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.14%Realty Income Corp 4.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QQQI and RNTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QQQIRNTYQQQIRNTYQQQIRNTY
3 months−0.7%−2.3%3.4%3.0%+1.8 pts−4.5 pts
6 months+16.7%+2.5%7.7%6.2%−7.5 pts−15.6 pts
1 year+16.4%+4.6%15.2%11.9%−5.3 pts−12.0 pts
Since launch+59.6%+7.9%39.9%15.8%−12.3 pts−39.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QQQI and RNTY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
RNTY
YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Real Estate Option Income ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerNEOSYieldMax
Strategyoption incomesynthetic covered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized14.0%12.5%
Expense ratio0.68%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year15.2%11.9%
Price change, 1 year−0.1%−7.3%
Total return, 1 year+16.4%+4.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−5.3 pts−12.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate98%0%
Age962 days519 days
Net assets$14.8bn$6m

QQQI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

RNTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, RNTY paid 11.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.5%, paid monthly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QQQI or RNTY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting price in cash and RNTY paid 11.9%, so QQQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QQQI or RNTY?
With every distribution reinvested, QQQI returned +16.4% and RNTY returned +4.6% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QQQI returned more.
Which is cheaper, QQQI or RNTY?
QQQI charges 0.68% a year and RNTY charges 0.99%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQI against RNTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQI against RNTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qqqi-vs-rnty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources