Data as of .
ACSP vs FDND: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and FDND both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and FDND hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACSP | Only in FDND |
|---|---|
| S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF 100.00% | Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 10.12% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 9.98% | |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 8.66% | |
| Netflix, Inc. 5.90% | |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 5.82% | |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class C) 4.65% | |
| Arista Networks, Inc. 4.62% | |
| Salesforce, Inc. 4.36% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSP | FDND | ACSP | FDND | ACSP | FDND | |
| 3 months | not published | +8.9% | not published | 2.0% | not published | +8.5 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +18.8% | not published | 4.3% | not published | +4.8 pts |
| 1 year | not published | −0.6% | not published | 7.1% | not published | −14.1 pts |
| Since launch | −3.8% | +34.3% | 0.0% | 20.4% | −2.1 pts | −0.5 pts |
| ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on SPY | FDND FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF Option income on DIA, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | First Trust |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 7.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.75% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 7.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.8% | −8.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | −3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | −0.6% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.6% | +13.5% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.1 pts | −14.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 35 days | 911 days |
| Net assets | $27m | $10m |
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.
FDND in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACSP or FDND?
- ACSP charges 0.72% a year and FDND charges 0.75%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against FDND, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-fdnd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.