Data as of .
DDDD vs FTQI: which paid, and which earned it?
DDDD and FTQI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DDDD and FTQI hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DDDD | FTQI |
|---|---|---|
| Amgen Inc | 4.38% | 0.87% |
| East West Bancorp Inc | 0.44% | 0.26% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 4.30% | 0.22% |
| Cincinnati Financial Corp | 0.67% | 0.15% |
| SLB Ltd | 1.94% | 0.13% |
| Chevron Corp | 4.25% | 0.12% |
| Only in DDDD | Only in FTQI |
|---|---|
| Merck & Co Inc 4.93% | Apple Inc. 8.76% |
| Abbott Laboratories 4.53% | NVIDIA Corporation 6.55% |
| ConocoPhillips 4.07% | US Dollar 5.75% |
| Procter & Gamble Co/The 4.01% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 5.41% |
| Verizon Communications Inc 3.96% | Amazon.com, Inc. 4.13% |
| UnitedHealth Group Inc 3.84% | Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.18% |
| Home Depot Inc/The 3.68% | Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 2.75% |
| PepsiCo Inc 3.50% | Tesla, Inc. 2.68% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDDD | FTQI | DDDD | FTQI | DDDD | FTQI | |
| 3 months | +4.9% | +4.0% | 1.6% | 2.9% | +2.6 pts | +6.5 pts |
| 6 months | +10.5% | +18.3% | 1.7% | 6.3% | −7.6 pts | −5.9 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +21.5% | not published | 12.0% | not published | −0.3 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +62.9% | not published | 37.0% | not published | −35.3 pts |
| Since launch | +8.7% | +141.7% | 1.6% | 78.8% | −6.5 pts | −675.0 pts |
| DDDD YieldMax(R) U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY | FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | First Trust |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 18.4% | 11.9% |
| Expense ratio | 1.01% | 0.75% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 1.6% (since launch on Mar 12, 2026) | 12.0% |
| Price change, 1 year | +7.0% | +8.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.7% (since launch on Mar 12, 2026) | +21.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +15.3% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −6.5 pts | −0.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 67% | not published |
| Age | 190 days | 4637 days |
| Net assets | $7m | $975m |
DDDD in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 12, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, DDDD paid 1.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.4%, paid periodically. YieldMax estimates that 67% of the distribution paid Jul 6, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
FTQI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FTQI paid 12.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.9%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, DDDD or FTQI?
- DDDD charges 1.01% a year and FTQI charges 0.75%, so FTQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DDDD against FTQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dddd-vs-ftqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.