Data as of .
DDDD vs QDTE: which paid, and which earned it?
DDDD and QDTE both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DDDD and QDTE hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DDDD | QDTE |
|---|---|---|
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | 1.65% | 3.90% |
| Only in DDDD | Only in QDTE |
|---|---|
| Merck & Co Inc 4.93% | NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 25.90% |
| Abbott Laboratories 4.53% | QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 24.77% |
| Amgen Inc 4.38% | NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.64% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.30% | QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.82% |
| Chevron Corp 4.25% | Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 4.97% |
| ConocoPhillips 4.07% | |
| Procter & Gamble Co/The 4.01% | |
| Verizon Communications Inc 3.96% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDDD | QDTE | DDDD | QDTE | DDDD | QDTE | |
| 3 months | +4.9% | −0.9% | 1.6% | 7.6% | +2.6 pts | +1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +10.5% | +19.7% | 1.7% | 16.2% | −7.6 pts | −4.5 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +21.1% | not published | 36.1% | not published | −0.7 pts |
| Since launch | +8.7% | +59.9% | 1.6% | 74.1% | −6.5 pts | −4.3 pts |
| DDDD YieldMax(R) U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY | QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | Roundhill |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | 0DTE covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | not established | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 18.4% | 20.8% |
| Expense ratio | 1.01% | 0.96% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 1.6% (since launch on Mar 12, 2026) | 36.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | +7.0% | −19.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.7% (since launch on Mar 12, 2026) | +21.1% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +15.3% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −6.5 pts | −0.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 67% | not published |
| Age | 190 days | 925 days |
| Net assets | $7m | $967m |
DDDD in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 12, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, DDDD paid 1.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 18.4%, paid periodically. YieldMax estimates that 67% of the distribution paid Jul 6, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
QDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, DDDD or QDTE?
- DDDD charges 1.01% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DDDD against QDTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dddd-vs-qdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.