Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

LAPR vs QDTE: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTE paid 36.1% of its price in cash against LAPR’s 5.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

5.9%LAPR cash paid, 1 year
36.1%QDTE cash paid, 1 year
+6.1%LAPR total return, 1 year
+21.1%QDTE total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: LAPR scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

LAPR 42.6QDTE 39.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

LAPR10.5 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%LAPR+6.1%5.9% as cash10.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%LAPR+6.1%10.5 pts behind SPY
QDTE0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% as cash0.7 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LAPR and QDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in LAPROnly in QDTE
TREASURY BILL 94.62%NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 25.90%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 24.77%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.64%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.82%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 4.97%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 3.90%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

LAPR and QDTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
LAPRQDTELAPRQDTELAPRQDTE
3 months+1.3%−0.9%1.7%7.6%−0.9 pts+1.6 pts
6 months+3.8%+19.7%3.3%16.2%−14.2 pts−4.5 pts
1 year+6.1%+21.1%5.9%36.1%−10.5 pts−0.7 pts
Since launch+16.1%+59.9%13.8%74.1%−34.1 pts−4.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
LAPR and QDTE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
LAPR
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April
Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerInnovatorRoundhill
Strategybuffer with income0DTE covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized6.7%20.8%
Expense ratio0.79%0.96%
Cash paid, 1 year5.9%36.1%
Price change, 1 year0.0%−19.2%
Total return, 1 year+6.1%+21.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−10.5 pts−0.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age900 days925 days
Net assets$11m$967m

LAPR in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LAPR paid 5.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, LAPR or QDTE?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LAPR paid 5.9% of its starting price in cash and QDTE paid 36.1%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, LAPR or QDTE?
With every distribution reinvested, LAPR returned +6.1% and QDTE returned +21.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, LAPR or QDTE?
LAPR charges 0.79% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so LAPR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LAPR against QDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LAPR against QDTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lapr-vs-qdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources