Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QDTE vs SDTY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTE paid 36.8% of its price in cash against SDTY’s 24.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and YieldMax(R) S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

36.8%QDTE cash paid, 1 year
24.7%SDTY cash paid, 1 year
+22.3%QDTE total return, 1 year
+16.9%SDTY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SDTY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QDTE 44.7SDTY 503.2, the lowest in this set96.9, the highest

A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QDTE0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%QDTE+22.3%36.8% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%QDTE+22.3%36.8% as cash0.7 pts behind QQQ
SDTY0.6 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
SPY+17.5%SDTY+16.9%24.7% of it arrived as cash0.6 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+17.5%SDTY+16.9%24.7% as cash0.6 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and SDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QDTEOnly in SDTY
NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 26.01%TREASURY BILL 92.47%
4NDX US 12/18/26 C2450.1 FLX 25.19%TREASURY BILL 3.84%
NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.18%TREASURY BILL 3.68%
4NDX US 09/18/26 C2250 FLX 18.27%
Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 5.05%
First American Government Obligations Fu 3.30%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QDTE and SDTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QDTESDTYQDTESDTYQDTESDTY
3 months+1.0%+4.6%7.8%6.1%+1.8 pts+1.3 pts
6 months+16.9%+14.8%15.9%13.8%−3.8 pts−1.2 pts
1 year+22.3%+16.9%36.8%24.7%−0.7 pts−0.6 pts
Since launch+58.3%+21.9%73.8%35.1%−4.3 pts−6.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QDTE and SDTY on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
SDTY
YieldMax(R) S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerRoundhillYieldMax
Strategy0DTE covered call0DTE covered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized24.3%21.0%
Expense ratio0.96%1.08%
Cash paid, 1 year36.8%24.7%
Price change, 1 year−18.5%−9.9%
Total return, 1 year+22.3%+16.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.0%+17.5%
Ahead or behind−0.7 pts−0.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published63%
Age918 days582 days

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QDTE paid 36.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 18.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 24.3%, paid weekly.

SDTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, SDTY paid 24.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 21.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 63% of the distribution paid Sep 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTE or SDTY?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, QDTE paid 36.8% of its starting price in cash and SDTY paid 24.7%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or SDTY?
With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +22.3% and SDTY returned +16.9% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, QDTE or SDTY?
QDTE charges 0.96% a year and SDTY charges 1.08%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QDTE against SDTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against SDTY, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-sdty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources