Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PCOV vs QDTE: which paid, and which earned it?

PCOV and QDTE both write options for income.

Principal Equity Premium Income ETF and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

0.0%PCOV cash paid, 1 year
36.1%QDTE cash paid, 1 year
−3.7%PCOV total return, 1 year
+21.1%QDTE total return, 1 year
PCOV3 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−0.7%PCOV−3.7%3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−0.7%PCOV−3.7%3 pts behind SPY
QDTE0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% as cash0.7 pts behind QQQ

Performance, window by window

PCOV and QDTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
PCOVQDTEPCOVQDTEPCOVQDTE
3 monthsnot published−0.9%not published7.6%not published+1.6 pts
6 monthsnot published+19.7%not published16.2%not published−4.5 pts
1 yearnot published+21.1%not published36.1%not published−0.7 pts
Since launch−3.7%+59.9%0.0%74.1%−3.0 pts−4.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PCOV and QDTE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PCOV
Principal Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerPrincipalRoundhill
Strategycovered call0DTE covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysnot establishedweekly
Payout rate, annualizednot published20.8%
Expense ratio0.34%0.96%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026)36.1%
Price change, 1 year−3.7%−19.2%
Total return, 1 year−3.7% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026)+21.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year−0.7%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−3.0 pts−0.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age30 days925 days
Net assetsnot published$967m

PCOV in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, PCOV paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −0.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts.

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, PCOV or QDTE?
PCOV charges 0.34% a year and QDTE charges 0.96%, so PCOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PCOV against QDTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PCOV against QDTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pcov-vs-qdte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources