Data as of .
QDTE vs SCLZ: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QDTE paid 36.1% of its price in cash against SCLZ’s 8.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SCLZ scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and SCLZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QDTE | Only in SCLZ |
|---|---|
| NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 25.90% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 7.89% |
| QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 24.77% | APPLE INC 6.15% |
| NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.64% | NVIDIA CORP 5.99% |
| QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.82% | ALPHABET INC 5.18% |
| Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 4.97% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 5.14% |
| First American Government Obligations Fu 3.90% | BROADCOM INC 4.71% |
| ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.86% | |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.75% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDTE | SCLZ | QDTE | SCLZ | QDTE | SCLZ | |
| 3 months | −0.9% | +2.9% | 7.6% | 2.1% | +1.6 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | +19.7% | +14.2% | 16.2% | 3.8% | −4.5 pts | +1.6 pts |
| 1 year | +21.1% | +13.2% | 36.1% | 8.4% | −0.7 pts | −14.0 pts |
| Since launch | +59.9% | +36.5% | 74.1% | 19.6% | −4.3 pts | −6.3 pts |
| QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | Swan |
| Strategy | 0DTE covered call | dividend stocks with call overlay |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 20.8% | 8.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.96% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 36.1% | 8.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | −19.2% | +4.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.1% | +13.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +27.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.7 pts | −14.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 925 days | 934 days |
| Net assets | $967m | $20m |
QDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.
SCLZ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, QDTE or SCLZ?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting price in cash and SCLZ paid 8.4%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or SCLZ?
- With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +21.1% and SCLZ returned +13.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
- Which is cheaper, QDTE or SCLZ?
- QDTE charges 0.96% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so SCLZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against SCLZ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-sclz Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.