Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QDTE vs QUSA: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTE paid 36.1% of its price in cash against QUSA’s 13.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF.

36.1%QDTE cash paid, 1 year
13.8%QUSA cash paid, 1 year
+21.1%QDTE total return, 1 year
+3.5%QUSA total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QDTE scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QDTE 39.9QUSA 21.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QDTE0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% as cash0.7 pts behind QQQ
QUSA11.7 pts behind QUAL · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%13.8% cash11.7 pts behind QUALTotal return, distributions reinvestedQUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%11.7 pts behind QUAL

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and QUSA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QDTEOnly in QUSA
NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 25.90%Microsoft Corp 6.08%
QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 24.77%Apple Inc 5.99%
NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.64%NVIDIA Corp 5.78%
QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.82%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 5.35%
Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 4.97%Caterpillar Inc 4.91%
First American Government Obligations Fu 3.90%Broadcom Inc 4.70%
Costco Wholesale Corp 4.40%
Coca-Cola Co/The 4.33%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QDTE and QUSA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QDTEQUSAQDTEQUSAQDTEQUSA
3 months−0.9%−1.9%7.6%3.6%+1.6 pts−3.6 pts
6 months+19.7%+10.4%16.2%7.8%−4.5 pts−4.3 pts
1 year+21.1%+3.5%36.1%13.8%−0.7 pts−11.7 pts
Since launch+59.9%+4.9%74.1%15.1%−4.3 pts−25.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QDTE and QUSA on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
QUSA
VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF
Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillVistaShares
Strategy0DTE covered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized20.8%15.3%
Expense ratio0.96%0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year36.1%13.8%
Price change, 1 year−19.2%−11.0%
Total return, 1 year+21.1%+3.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+15.2%
Ahead or behind−0.7 pts−11.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age925 days500 days
Net assets$967m$22m

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.

QUSA in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTE or QUSA?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting price in cash and QUSA paid 13.8%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or QUSA?
With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +21.1% and QUSA returned +3.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, QDTE or QUSA?
QDTE charges 0.96% a year and QUSA charges 0.97%, so QDTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QDTE against QUSA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against QUSA, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-qusa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources