Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QDTE vs XRMI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTE paid 36.1% of its price in cash against XRMI’s 12.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF.

36.1%QDTE cash paid, 1 year
12.1%XRMI cash paid, 1 year
+21.1%QDTE total return, 1 year
+10.3%XRMI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XRMI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QDTE 39.9XRMI 43.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QDTE0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% as cash0.7 pts behind QQQ
XRMI6.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XRMI+10.3%12.1% of it arrived as cash6.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XRMI+10.3%6.3 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and XRMI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QDTEOnly in XRMI
NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 25.90%NVIDIA CORP 8.27%
QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 24.77%APPLE INC 7.54%
NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.64%MICROSOFT CORP 5.63%
QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.82%AMAZON.COM INC 3.82%
Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 4.97%ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.15%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 3.90%BROADCOM INC 2.61%
ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.50%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QDTE and XRMI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QDTEXRMIQDTEXRMIQDTEXRMI
3 months−0.9%+3.5%7.6%3.0%+1.6 pts+1.2 pts
6 months+19.7%+8.9%16.2%6.3%−4.5 pts−9.1 pts
1 year+21.1%+10.3%36.1%12.1%−0.7 pts−6.3 pts
3 yearsnot published+27.2%not published33.3%not published−51.2 pts
Since launch+59.9%+17.0%74.1%43.8%−4.3 pts−66.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QDTE and XRMI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillGlobal X
Strategy0DTE covered calloption income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized20.8%12.3%
Expense ratio0.96%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year36.1%12.1%
Price change, 1 year−19.2%−2.4%
Total return, 1 year+21.1%+10.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−0.7 pts−6.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published95%
Age925 days1849 days
Net assets$967m$60m

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.

XRMI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XRMI paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.3%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTE or XRMI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting price in cash and XRMI paid 12.1%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or XRMI?
With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +21.1% and XRMI returned +10.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, QDTE or XRMI?
QDTE charges 0.96% a year and XRMI charges 0.60%, so XRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QDTE against XRMI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against XRMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-xrmi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources