Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QDTE vs XYLG: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTE paid 36.1% of its price in cash against XYLG’s 13.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF.

36.1%QDTE cash paid, 1 year
13.2%XYLG cash paid, 1 year
+21.1%QDTE total return, 1 year
+17.2%XYLG total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XYLG scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QDTE 39.9XYLG 733.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QDTE0.7 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTE+21.1%36.1% as cash0.7 pts behind QQQ
XYLG0.7 pts ahead of SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XYLG+17.2%13.2% of it arrived as cash0.7 pts ahead of SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XYLG+17.2%13.2% cash0.7 pts ahead of SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and XYLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QDTEOnly in XYLG
NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 25.90%NVIDIA CORP 8.20%
QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 24.77%APPLE INC 7.50%
NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.64%MICROSOFT CORP 5.59%
QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.82%AMAZON.COM INC 3.81%
Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 4.97%ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.12%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 3.90%BROADCOM INC 2.59%
ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.48%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QDTE and XYLG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QDTEXYLGQDTEXYLGQDTEXYLG
3 months−0.9%+3.6%7.6%1.3%+1.6 pts+1.3 pts
6 months+19.7%+15.7%16.2%3.0%−4.5 pts−2.3 pts
1 year+21.1%+17.2%36.1%13.2%−0.7 pts+0.7 pts
3 yearsnot published+60.9%not published43.0%not published−17.5 pts
Since launch+59.9%+114.0%74.1%69.0%−4.3 pts−38.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QDTE and XYLG on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QDTE
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillGlobal X
Strategy0DTE covered callcovered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized20.8%4.4%
Expense ratio0.96%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year36.1%13.2%
Price change, 1 year−19.2%+2.6%
Total return, 1 year+21.1%+17.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−0.7 pts+0.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published80%
Age925 days2188 days
Net assets$967m$65m

QDTE in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.

XYLG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XYLG paid 13.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.4%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTE or XYLG?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting price in cash and XYLG paid 13.2%, so QDTE paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTE or XYLG?
With every distribution reinvested, QDTE returned +21.1% and XYLG returned +17.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTE returned more.
Which is cheaper, QDTE or XYLG?
QDTE charges 0.96% a year and XYLG charges 0.35%, so XYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QDTE against XYLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against XYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-xylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources