Data as of .
ACQQ vs XYLG: which paid, and which earned it?
ACQQ and XYLG both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACQQ and XYLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACQQ | Only in XYLG |
|---|---|
| NDX100 35% VOLATILITY AUTOCALLABLE SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | NVIDIA CORP 8.20% |
| APPLE INC 7.50% | |
| MICROSOFT CORP 5.59% | |
| AMAZON.COM INC 3.81% | |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.12% | |
| BROADCOM INC 2.59% | |
| ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.48% | |
| META PLATFORMS INC 2.24% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACQQ | XYLG | ACQQ | XYLG | ACQQ | XYLG | |
| 3 months | not published | +3.6% | not published | 1.3% | not published | +1.3 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +15.7% | not published | 3.0% | not published | −2.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +17.2% | not published | 13.2% | not published | +0.7 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +60.9% | not published | 43.0% | not published | −17.5 pts |
| Since launch | −2.1% | +114.0% | 0.0% | 69.0% | −0.8 pts | −38.7 pts |
| ACQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on QQQ | XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | Global X |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 4.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 13.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | −2.1% | +2.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | −2.1% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +17.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.3% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.8 pts | +0.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 80% |
| Age | 35 days | 2188 days |
| Net assets | $23m | $65m |
ACQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned −1.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts.
XYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XYLG paid 13.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.4%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACQQ or XYLG?
- ACQQ charges 0.72% a year and XYLG charges 0.35%, so XYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACQQ against XYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acqq-vs-xylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.